Obama funds $20M tax payer dollars to immigrate Hamas Refugees to the USA

[Max7]

This is the news that didn't make the headlines...

By executive order, President Barack Obama has ordered the expenditure of
$20.3 million in migration assistance to the Palestinian refugees and
conflict victims in Gaza . The "presidential determination" which allows
hundreds of thousands of Palestinians with ties to Hamas to resettle in the
United States was signed on January 27 and appeared in the Federal Register
on February 4.

Few on Capitol Hill took note that the order provides a free ticket replete
with housing and food allowances to individuals who have displayed their
overwhelming support of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) in the
parliamentary election of January 2006.

A review of Barack Obama's most recent actions since he was inaugurated a
little more than two weeks ago:
His first call to any head of state as president was to Mahmoud Abbas,
leader of Fatah party in the Palestinian territory.
His first one-on-one interview with any news organization was with Al Arabia
television.
He ordered Guantanamo Bay closed and all military trials of detainees
halted.
He ordered all overseas CIA interrogation centers closed.
He withdrew all charges against the masterminds behind the USS Cole and
9/11.

Now we learn that he is allowing hundreds of thousands of Palestinian
refuges to move to and live in the US at American taxpayer expense.
To verify for yourself:
www.thefederalregister.com/d.p/2009-02-04-E9-2488


PLEASE PASS THIS ON...AMERICA NEEDS TO KNOW

[avjeepfreek]

This is an OUTRAGE!

[sarah]

Woooooooooooow - unbelievable!

[Kodiak Spirit]

--- told ya so? anyone? anyone?

[GP4Play]

Thanks Max.You guy's make me look smart when I talk to the lib-dem's at work about this guy.

[Matt2001TJ]

--- told ya so? anyone? anyone?

Stuff like this is the reason why I voted for the first time in my life,...to try and keep this guy out of office. I don't want to know whats next.

[The-Hurricane]

snopes calls bs on that....

[RAT]

snopes calls bs on that....

X2... So which one is the most unbiased? The Federal Register or Snopes? I'm beginning to be skeptical about everything I read in print or electronic form. There are way too many pundits out there, and they all know it all. Who's right?

[sarah]

snopes calls bs on that....

No offense, but snopes doesn't have a perfect track record... *shrugs* That's kinda like trusting wikipedia. You're right, though, who can you trust? That is something you'll have to figure out for yourself by staying vigilant and simply watching the facts (and following the money, unfortunately).

[Max7]

Who is behind snopes.com ?

snopes calls bs on that....

Good read:

"For the past few years www.snopes.com has positioned itself, or others have labeled it, as the 'tell all final word' on any comment, claim and email.

But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind snopes.com. Only recently did Wikipedia get to the bottom of it - kinda makes you wonder what they were hiding. Well, finally we know. It is run by a husband and wife team - that's right, no big office of investigators and researchers, no team of lawyers. It's just a mom-and-pop operation that began as a hobby.

David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the website about 13 years ago - and they have no formal background or experience in investigative research. After a few years it gained popularity believing it to be unbiased and neutral, but over the past couple of years people started asking questions who was behind it and did they have a selfish motivation? The reason for the questions - or skepticisms - is a result of snopes.com claiming to have the bottom line facts to certain questions or issue when in fact they have been proven wrong. Also, there were criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the 'true' bottom of various issues. I can personally vouch for that complaint.

A few months ago, when my State Farm agent Bud Gregg in Mandeville hoisted a political sign referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across the internet, 'supposedly' the Mikkelson's claim to have researched this issue before posting their findings on snopes.com. In their statement they claimed the corporate office of State Farm pressured Gregg into taking down the sign, when in fact nothing of the sort 'ever' took place.

I personally contacted D avid Mikkelson (and he replied back to me) thinking he would want to get to the bottom of this and I gave him Bud Gregg's contact phone numbers - and Bud was going to give him phone numbers to the big exec's at State Farm in Illinois who would have been willing to speak with him about it. He never called Bud. In fact, I learned from Bud Gregg no one from snopes.com ever contacted anyone with State Farm. Yet, snopes.com issued a statement as the 'final factual word' on the issue as if they did all their homework and got to the bottom of things - not!

Then it has been learned the Mikkelson's are Jewish - very Democratic (party) and extremely liberal. As we all now know from this presidential election, liberals have a purpose agenda to discredit anything that appears to be conservative. There has been much criticism lately over the internet with people pointing out the Mikkelson's liberalism revealing itself in their website findings. Gee, what a shock?

So, I say this now to everyone who goes to www.snopes.com to get what they think to be the bottom line facts...'proceed with caution.' Take what it says at face value and nothing more. Use it only to lead you to their references where you can link to and read the sources for yourself. Plus, you can always google a subject and do the research yourself. It now seems apparent that's all the Mikkelson's do. After all, I can personally vouch from my own experience for their 'not' fully looking into things."

[The-Hurricane]

hmm good to know, i said the same thing to my dad when he showed me the obama info on snopes...we both agreed that its getting hard to trust anything these days...

[Kodiak Spirit]

"...never mind the man behind the curtain..."