Tweet
Ron Paul
Sarah,
I know you guys really like Ron Paul and I admit I like 90% of his ideas.
It is my opinion that Dr. Paul lacks the wherewithal to achieve his somewhat doomsday derived approach to activating the Nation. I am fully aware of the doom and peril that we face if the current policies do not cease and are not corrected. However I feel there are more uplifting members of the conservative movement that seem more selfless than Dr. Paul.
Dr. Paul's core principals are extremely sound constitutionally speaking. I am in great support of his boarder policy, "put illegal immigrants where they belong: back to their home countries right at the end of the line of legal immigrants patiently waiting to be approved."
There are a couple of his beliefs that I can't quite agree with or just don't agree with, for instance: Dr. Paul's foreign policy of nonintervention made him the only 2008 Republican presidential candidate to have voted against the Iraq War Resolution in 2002, and he also thinks the states should decide whether to regulate or deregulate drugs such as medical marijuana. The later having a bit of a "zane" factor regardless of good intentions. The first concerns me in reference to his National Security stance. National Security is first on my list of concerns for our Nation.
For the same reason Paul officially withdrew his bid for the Republican nomination, citing his resources could be better spent on improving America, it is my belief that his followers should withdraw their support of him for a Presidential Candidate and hone their support collectively into a less stale better fit candidate.
I personally think that he will not make through the next primaries, but I am glad he is a member of our movement as he has a lot to offer, not as much as others, and we need the absolute BEST!
Here is a video that states some interesting theories what do you think about it?
Link: http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/1...the-big-story/
Sarah I respect your views, and I would like to hear them!
Best, Max7
Sarah,
I know you guys really like Ron Paul and I admit I like 90% of his ideas.
It is my opinion that Dr. Paul lacks the wherewithal to achieve his somewhat doomsday derived approach to activating the Nation. I am fully aware of the doom and peril that we face if the current policies do not cease and are not corrected. However I feel there are more uplifting members of the conservative movement that seem more selfless than Dr. Paul.
Dr. Paul's core principals are extremely sound constitutionally speaking. I am in great support of his boarder policy, "put illegal immigrants where they belong: back to their home countries right at the end of the line of legal immigrants patiently waiting to be approved."
There are a couple of his beliefs that I can't quite agree with or just don't agree with, for instance: Dr. Paul's foreign policy of nonintervention made him the only 2008 Republican presidential candidate to have voted against the Iraq War Resolution in 2002, and he also thinks the states should decide whether to regulate or deregulate drugs such as medical marijuana. The later having a bit of a "zane" factor regardless of good intentions. The first concerns me in reference to his National Security stance. National Security is first on my list of concerns for our Nation.
For the same reason Paul officially withdrew his bid for the Republican nomination, citing his resources could be better spent on improving America, it is my belief that his followers should withdraw their support of him for a Presidential Candidate and hone their support collectively into a less stale better fit candidate.
I personally think that he will not make through the next primaries, but I am glad he is a member of our movement as he has a lot to offer, not as much as others, and we need the absolute BEST!
Here is a video that states some interesting theories what do you think about it?
Link: http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/1...the-big-story/
Sarah I respect your views, and I would like to hear them!
Best, Max7
Comment